The citation gap test is ingenious for revelaing true autonomy limits. What makes SciSpace Agents particularly intresting is how it exposes tooling directly to the LLM rather than hardcoding decision points, which suggests a middle ground between full autonomy and rigid workflows might be where practical acadmeic search lands. The auditability argument for workflows is underrated though, especially when researchers need to defend their methodology to reviewers who dont trust black-box reasoning chains.
I see Elicit.com just launched their agentic platform with 6 Ai workflows. Haven't tried yet to see if they are similar to Scispace agents that can mix and match or just 6 fixed workflows
Brilliant dissection of the workflow vs reasoning divide. The citation gap test really exposes how these tools are pattern-matchers rather than flexible thinkers, something that matters alot when venturing outside predefined templates. The speed-reliability tradeoff is intresting too becuase for most standarized lit reviews, I'd probably take Undermind's 8-minute workflow over 30-minute open-ended reasoning anyway.
The citation gap test is ingenious for revelaing true autonomy limits. What makes SciSpace Agents particularly intresting is how it exposes tooling directly to the LLM rather than hardcoding decision points, which suggests a middle ground between full autonomy and rigid workflows might be where practical acadmeic search lands. The auditability argument for workflows is underrated though, especially when researchers need to defend their methodology to reviewers who dont trust black-box reasoning chains.
I see Elicit.com just launched their agentic platform with 6 Ai workflows. Haven't tried yet to see if they are similar to Scispace agents that can mix and match or just 6 fixed workflows
Brilliant dissection of the workflow vs reasoning divide. The citation gap test really exposes how these tools are pattern-matchers rather than flexible thinkers, something that matters alot when venturing outside predefined templates. The speed-reliability tradeoff is intresting too becuase for most standarized lit reviews, I'd probably take Undermind's 8-minute workflow over 30-minute open-ended reasoning anyway.